Wednesday, April 30, 2014

This sadly speaks for itself

"Dear Ed,

Thanks. I was told in an e-mail from Town staff that the reason for the delay in preparing minutes was because it was so “labor intensive” to write them. Your message is the first time anyone has suggested that minutes will not someday be written of the meeting. As I understand it from press reports, there was considerable give and take between those Council members present and others participating in the meeting. What was asked, how it was answered, and how it was discussed no doubt plays a role in the continuing evolution of this process. We, the taxpayers, are entitled to know what was said and done at that meeting, and this note is a formal request for just that report.  Anything less is unacceptable.

I had early asked if we taxpayers could sit in on the meetings between the Town staff and the developer seeking a change in the current zoning. I was told no, and that none of those meetings would be noticed.

Frankly, I find the entire process a charade, largely intended to permit negotiations between the Town staff and the developer to run their course without having to bother with anyone who may disagree with the direction that those two groups choose to move.

Either the Town of Chapel Hill is committed to full transparency and inclusion or it is not. I am rapidly understanding that it is the latter, and since no one else who is a part of the “government” in this case seems to care, it is for the rest of us to seek legal and public opportunities to challenge the Town’s secrecy. It is a terrible waste of effort and resources, but sometimes this becomes necessary.

In any case, thanks for your note.

Cheers,

Terry

From: Ed Harrison [mailto:ed.harrison@mindspring.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:20 PM
To: Terry MAGUIRE
Cc: 'Amy Harvey'; 'Roger Stancil'; 'Flo Miller'; 'Ralph Karpinos'; 'Town Council'; 'Catherine Lazorko'; 'Carolyn Worsley'; 'Sabrina Oliver'; ken@wfarchitecture.com; 'John Richardson'; 'Amy Oland'; 'Matthew Brinkley'; 'Glenn Davis'; 'Tina Vaughn'; 'Angela Gerald'; 'Renee Moye'; 'Megan Wooley'; 'Jeff York'; 'Jim Orr'; 'JB Culpepper'; 'Loryn Clark'; 'Bill Webster'; 'David Bonk'; 'Eric Feld'; 'Gene Poveromo'; 'Jennifer Phillips'; 'Donna Bell'; 'George Cianciolo'; 'Jim Ward'; 'Jim Ward'; leestorrow.ch@gmail.com; 'Maria Palmer'; 'Mark Kleinschmidt'; 'Mark McCurry'; 'Matt Czajkowski'; 'Sally Greene'; 'Christina Strauch'
Subject: Re: 4/21/14 and 4/23/14 Continued Business Meeting and Public Hearing Pre- and Post-Meeting Materials Posted

Terry,

In more than 12 years on Council, I recall few if any minutes from Council work sessions. It generally isn't procedure to take them. It could be that a work session later in the process might result in a list of main points from staff for Council to evaluate. This was the case after the Glen Lennox Development Agreement work session a couple of months ago. 

Ed"


Monday, April 28, 2014

So-called "public information" meetings

Obey Creek Public Information Meetings

The Town of Chapel Hill will hold public information meetings related to the proposed mixed use development on the east side of U.S. 15-501 South across from Southern Village. The meetings are scheduled for noon to 1:30 pm on Wednesday, May 7, and 6 to 7:30 p.m. Thursday, May 15, in Room B of the Chapel Hill Public Library.

Residents will hear from the Town and the development team on several topics including design, transportation, housing strategies and the environment. Both meetings will follow the same format and topics, so residents can choose the more convenient day to attend.

Obey Creek is a 124-acre property under consideration for a proposed mixed use development. It is one of two potential developments using a new development agreement process. The Obey Creek Compass Committee, appointed by the Town Council, is scheduled to provide the Council with a report and an outline of issues this fall to be discussed should the project move into a development agreement negotiation.

Obey Creek is within Area 6: U.S. 15-501 South, one of six future focus areas outlined in Chapel Hill 2020, the community's comprehensive plan. Future focus areas are portions of Chapel Hill most likely to change in the future due to vacant land, underdeveloped sites, and their locations along transportation and transit corridors. In total, these areas represent about 24 percent of the land in Chapel Hill, and they do not include the predominately single-family areas and neighborhoods of Chapel Hill. The town’s other focus areas are Area 1: Downtown Chapel Hill; Area 2: North Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/I-40; Area 3: South Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/Homestead Road to Estes Drive; Area 4: Highway 54; and Area 5: Ephesus-Fordham.

For more information on the Obey Creek Development Agreement process, visit http://www.townofchapelhill.org/obeycreek.

Questions? Email developmentagreement@townofchapelhill.org with “Obey Creek” in the subject line. 

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Still No Vote on Ephesus-Fordham Plan, But Lots of Public Input - Chapelboro.com

The most frustrating part of all this is the challenge of the amateurs whom "we" have elected to the Town Council. It really is so disappointing.

Small Businesses Fight Big-Box Stores By Specializing : NPR

What can we learn from the experiences of very different businesses in and around (2-3 miles) Southern Village? Consider the number of people joining and using O2 Fitness at Cole Park Plaza and the apparently struggling Tutti Frutti in Southern Village. Is it a function of product or service or of need or necessity? What to learn from this?

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Leveled by Landslide, Towns Mull How to Rebuild - NYTimes.com

The loss was horrendous, of course, and we need to make sure we do the right thing by Obey Creek.

Obey Creek | Chapel Hill, Our Town!

First time I am seeing this.

Can Paradise Be Planned? - NYTimes.com

What if we turned Obey Creek primarily into a place to park and profit from Chapel Hill?That might be to go to a job, or it might mean to shop or to eat or even take in a film. What if the gateway to Chapel Hill from the south were to become a place to ditch your car and to hop on incredibly convenient transit that would take you anywhere you wanted to go in the town. Perhaps others could be built at the Friday Center, along 15-501 to the northeast on the Town/County line? We'd then focus all of our Town resources on providing routes for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders to enjoy all that is in the town.



"Whether viewed through the lens of data, nostalgia or aerial photography, automobile-dependent sprawl not only has a damaging impact on the environment but is also connected to poorer economy, health and safety. There’s no question that things need to change. The Smart Growth report suggests that many decision-makers like mayors and planning commissioners are re-examining traditional zoning, economic development incentives, transportation access and availability (or the lack thereof), and other policies that have helped to create sprawling development patterns — and are opting instead to create more connections, transportation choices and walkable neighborhoods in their communities. Still, I fear we’re going to be stuck in traffic for a long time."


Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Bayer CropScience opens $2.4M bee center in RTP to improve bee health, agriculture - Triangle Business Journal

I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of the developer's current plan for Obey Creek and one that, instead, used the land for a dedicated business/research purpose with a link of some kind locally. For example, a crop research center?

Washington Retail District’s Future Rides on Streetcars - NYTimes.com

Maybe a more radical approach is needed for Obey Creek.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

CHCCS Officials Ask Town Council To Save Room For Schools - Chapelboro.com

Have we seen a full discussion of how Obey Creek might be used as a school site? That presents its own traffic issues, especially with so many parents driving kids to and from school instead of walking.

The Daily Tar Heel :: Chapel Hill , Carrboro offer limited office space for growing businesses

This does not somehow ring true. Parts are; others not.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Town Council 9 April 2014

So, the Town government has been meeting privately - the public specifically has been excluded - with the developer and outside people paid for by the developer, and now they will tell the Council what to do. The absence of public involvement in this stage of discussions is horrifying.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014